Persia

The Land Of First Human Rights Charter

  • "I have no religion, but if I were to choose one, it would be that of Shariati's." Jean-Paul Sartre ---------------------------------- My Lord, grant me success in struggling during failure, in having patience in disappointment, in going alone, in Jihad without weapons, in working without pay, in making sacrifice in silence, in having religious belief in the world, in having ideology without popular traditions, in having faith (Iman) without pretensions, non-conformity without immaturity, beauty without physical appearance, loneliness in the crowd, and loving without the beloved knowing about it. ----------------------------------
  • HAJJ: Reflection on Its Rituals, by Ali Shariati
  • photos: Farshad Palideh & Ehsan Mohammadi
  • April 2008
    M T W T F S S
    « Mar   May »
     123456
    78910111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    282930  

Muhammad Iqbal, By Ali Shariati

Posted by Parsin on April 28, 2008

If one were to reconstruct the form of Islam, which has been made to degenerate over the course of history, re-assemble it in such a way that its spirit could return to a complete body, and transform the present disorientated elements of Islam into that spirit, as if the trumpet of Israfil were to blow in the 20th century over a dead society and awaken its movement, power, spirit, and meaning, it is then that exemplary Muslim personalities like Muhammad Iqbal would be reconstructed and reborn.

Muhammad Iqbal is not just a Muslim mystic who is solely concerned with mysticism or gnosis as were Ghazzali, Muhyi Din ibn Arabi, and Rumi. They emphasized individual evolution, purification of the soul, and the inner illuminated ‘self’. They only developed and trained a few people like themselves but, for the most part, remained oblivious to the outside world, having been almost unaware of the Mongol attack and the subsequent despotic rule and suppression of the people.

Iqbal is also not like Abu Muslim, Hasan Sabah or Saladin Ayyubi and personalities like them who, in the history of Islam, are simply men of the sword, power, war, and struggle and who consider the exercise of power and the defeat of the enemy enough to effect reform and revolution in the minds of the people and in their social relationships.

Nor is Iqbal similar to those learned individuals like the Indian, Sir Sayyid Ahmad Khan, who imagined that no matter in what situation Islamic society is (even if it is under the domination of a British viceroy), it can be revived with modern scholarly interpretations or with 20th century scientific and logical commentaries on Islamic tenets and Quranic verses, as well as through profound philosophical and scholarly research.

Iqbal is not among some Western people who consider science to be sufficient for human salvation, for evolution, and for curing anguish. He is not one of those philosophers who thinks meeting economic needs is tantamount to meeting all human needs. Nor is he like his fellow countrymen, that is, the great Hindu and Buddhist thinkers who consider peace of mind and spiritual salvation to be transmigration, or who consider the cycle of kanna to Nirvana to be the fulfillment of the mission of humanity, and who imagine that in a society where there is even one hungry person, where slavery, deprivation and disgrace exist, one can still develop pure, elevated spirits and disciplined, educated people who have attained well-being and even a sense of morality !

No. Iqbal demonstrates through his very being and through his School of Thought that thoughts which are related to Islam are thoughts which, while paying careful attention to this world and the material needs of humanity, also give the human being a heart. As he himself says, “I find the most beautiful states of life during the yearnings and meditations between daybreak and dawn.”

He is a great mystic, with a pure spirit, delivered from materialism and, at the same time, a man who respects and honors science, technological progress, and the advancement of human reason in our age. He is not a thinker who debases science, reason, and scientific advancement having had his emotions aroused by Sufism, Christianity, the religion of Lao Tzu, or Buddha. Neither is he a proponent of “dry” factual science like the science of Francis Bacon or Claude Bernard, which is limited to the discovery of the relationships between phenomena or material manifestations and the employment of natural forces for material life. At the same time, he is not a thinker who links philosophy, illumination, science, religion, reason, and revelation together in an incongruous way, as some have done. Rather, in his outlook and attitude towards this world, he regards reason and science in the very sense they are understood today as allies of love, emotion, and inspiration in the evolution of the human spirit, but he does not accept their goals.

The greatest advice of Iqbal to humanity is: Have a heart like Jesus, thought like Socrates, and a hand like the hand of a Caesar, but all in one human being, in one creature of humanity, based upon one spirit in order to attain one goal. That is, to be like Iqbal himself: A man who attains the height of political awareness in his time to the extent that some people believe him to be solely a political figure and a liberated, nationalist leader who is a 20th century anti-colonialist. A man who, in philosophical thought, rises to such a high level that he is considered to be a contemporary thinker and philosopher of the same rank as Bergson in the West today or of the same level as Ghazzali in Islamic history.

At the same time, he is a man we regard as being a reformer of Islamic society, who thinks about the conditions of human and Islamic society, a society in which he himself lives and for which he performs jihad (i.e. struggles nobly in the way of God) for the salvation, awareness, and liberation of Muslim people. His efforts are not just casual and scientific or of the kind that Sartre called “intellectual demonstrations of political, pseudo-leftists” but rather of the kind exhibited by responsible individuals. He struggles and strives and, at the same time, he is also a lover of Rumi. He journeys with him in his spiritual ascensions and burns from the lover’s flames, anguishes, and spiritual anxieties. This great man does not become one-dimensional, does not disintegrate, does not become a one-sided or one-dimensional Muslim. He is a complete Muslim. Even though he loves Rumi, he is not obliterated by him.

Iqbal goes to Europe and becomes a philosopher. He comes to know the European Schools of philosophy and makes them known to others. Everyone admits that he is a 20th-century philosopher, but he does not surrender to Western thinking. On the contrary, he conquers the West. He lives with a critical mind and the power of choice in the 20th century and in the Western civilization. He is devoted to and a disciple of Rumi to an extent that does not contradict and is not incompatible with the authentic dimensions of the Islamic spirit.

Sufism says “As our fate has been pre-determined in our absence, if it is not to your satisfaction, do not complain”. Or, “If the world does not agree with you or suit you, you should agree with the world”. But Iqbal, the mystic, says “If the world does not agree with you, arise against it!”. “The world” means the destiny and life of human beings. The human being is a wave, not a static shoreline. His or her being and becoming is in motion. What do I mean? It is to be in motion. In the mysticism of Iqbal, which is neither Hindu mysticism nor religious fanaticism, but Quranic mysticism, the human being must change the world. Quranic Islam has substituted “heavenly fate” in which the human being is nothing, with “human fate” in which the human being plays an important role. This is the greatest revolutionary, as well as progressive and constructive principle which Islam has created by its world view, philosophy of life, and ethics.

The greatest criticism that humanism and liberal intellectuals have leveled and continue to level against religion is that religious beliefs have been interpreted as being founded on absolute determinism or Divine Will, and thus the absolute subjugation of human will, so the human being is logically reduced to being weak in terms of free-choice in relation to the Absolute. If this were true, it would be a disgrace. It would be servitude and a means for the negation of power, freedom, and responsibility. It would be to submit to the status quo, to ‘whatever will be, will be’, to accept any fate which is imposed upon the human being in this world and to admit to the futility and uselessness of life. As past, present, and future events have been and will continue to be dictated by fate, in this view, any criticism or objection, then, or efforts to attain our hearts’ desires or to change the situation, must be subjugated to “whatever has been pre-destined for us”. In this way, the human being’s attempts to change, convert, and amend the status quo become impossible, unreasonable, and ill-advised.

But in the philosophy of Islam, although the One God has Absolute Power and is Almighty and although for Him is the Creation, Guidance, Expediency, and Rule over the universe, “His is the Creation and the Command.” (7:54), at the same time, the human being, in this extensive universe, is considered in such a way that while one cannot dissociate oneself from the rule of God and from Divine Sovereignty, one can live freely. A Muslim has free will and the power to rebel and surrender. Thus, he or she is responsible and the maker of his or her own image. “Every soul is held in pledge for what he earns” (74:38). “And the human being shall have nothing but what he strives for” (53:30).

In his mystic journey with the Quran, Iqbal described this principle, that is, the principle of authenticity of deed and responsibility towards human beings, that which humanists, existentialists, or radicals endeavor to help humanity achieve by negating religion and denying God. These people, quite rightly, see the religion and the God conceived by the minds of human beings to be incompatible with human freedom, esteem, authenticity, and responsibility, whereas Islam, without resorting to philosophical justification and interpretation, clearly declares “the day when the human being shall see what his two hands have sent before” (78:40).

With his outlook, his orientation to faith and his Islamic mysticism, Iqbal passed through all the philosophical and spiritual states of this age. It can be said that he was a Muslim migrant who appeared in the depths of the Indian Ocean and rose to the highest peaks of honor of the majestic European mountains, but he did not remain there. He returned to us to offer his nation – that is, to offer us – whatever he had learned on his wondrous journey. Through his personality, I see that once again Islam in the 20th century presents a model, an example, for the anguished but confused new generation which has some degree of self-awareness. A shining spirit, full of Eastern inspiration, is selected from the land of the heart of spiritual culture and illumination. The great thoughts of the West, the land of civilization, intellect, and knowledge with the power of creativity and advancement are placed in his mind. Then, with all of this investment, he becomes knowledgeable of the 20th century. He is not one of those reactionaries and worshippers of the past who have enmity towards the West and whatever is new; who oppose new civilization without a sound reason. He is also not like those who imitate and are absorbed by the West without having the courage to criticize and to choose. On the one hand, he employs science and, on the other, he senses its inadequacies and shortcomings in meeting the spiritual needs and the evolutionary requirements of humanity. He offers solutions for its completion. Iqbal is a person who has a world view, and he has developed philosophical-spiritual interpretations based upon it which he offers to the world and its people. Iqbal is a person who bases his social teaching upon his world view, and then offers his spiritual and philosophical interpretations of it. Based upon the culture and history with which he is associated, he develops the concept of a person based on the standard of an “Ali”, to the extent that the material for developing such a human being in our century allows.

What does the “standard of Ali” mean? It means a human being with an Eastern heart and a Western mind. It means a person who thinks deeply and profoundly. It means a human being who expresses a beautiful and splendid love. It refers to a person who is well acquainted with the anguish of the spirit as well as with the sufferings of life. It means a human being who both knows God and the people. It is a devotee possessing the light of knowledge who burns with love and faith, and whose penetrating eyes never allow negligence and ignorance to prevail without questioning the fate of enslaved nations. It is a person who seeks reform, revolution, and a change of mental attitudes. As a thinker, he realizes that the spiritless eye of science (according to Francis Bacon) is incapable of seeing all the realities of the universe. He also feels that a lovesick heart attains nothing if it is only concerned with asceticism, self-abasement and purification, because a human being affiliated with society and affiliated to life and the material world cannot disentangle the “self” alone. An individual moves with the caravan of society and cannot choose a way separate from it.

This is why we wish to have a School of thought and action which both responds to our philosophical needs, and at the same time develops a thinking being who is accepted by the world, recognized by civilization and the new culture of the world, and not one alienated from us and our rich cultural resources. We wish for a School of thought and action which nurtures a human being who is closely aware of our culture and all of our good spiritual and religious assets, who is not alienated from the times, and who does not live in the 4th or 5th century. We long for it to develop a human being who can think, who has a scientific mind, yet who does not remain negligent of the anguish, life, captivity, and hardships of his people. We desire the development of a human being who, even if he thinks about the real and material anguish of humanity and about the present confusions and difficulties of human society or his own society, does not forget the ideal human being or the significance of the human being or the eternal mission of humanity in history, and does not lower all human ideals to the level of material consumption.

All that we seek in these various domains can be found in Iqbal, because the only thing that Iqbal did – and this is the greatest success of Iqbal as a Muslim in an Islamic society in the 20th century – was that, based upon the knowledge he had of the rich new and old cultures, he was able to develop himself, based on the model which his ideological School, – that is, Islam, – gave. This is the greatest success of Iqbal in an Islamic society in the 20th century. We do not say that he is a perfect human being. No. We do not say he is a symbolic person. No. He is a personality who, after his disintegration, had been reconstructed into a complete Muslim person and a perfect Islamic personality in the 20th century. This reconstruction is the starting point from which we Muslim intellectuals must ourselves begin. We must feel our greatest responsibility to be in reconstructing ourselves and our society. Sayyid Jamal was the first who produced such a feeling of re-awakening. Asking “Who are you? Who were you?”, Iqbal was the first fruit from the seed of the movement which Sayyid Jamal planted in this people. The first product is a great model, an example, and our very awaken- ing. As Easterners, we are affiliated to this part of the world. We are connected with this history. We are human beings confronted by nature and by the West.

But what do we mean when we say Iqbal was a reformer? Can reform really save a society from all of its misfortunes, anguish, and difficulties? Must not a sudden, severe, deep-rooted revolution take place in thought and in relation to society? When we say Iqbal was a reformer, those present who are familiar with the expressions prevalent among the educated class think “reform” means something which is the opposite of “revolution” in a socio-political sense. Most often when we say “reform”, we mean gradual change or change in the superstructure, and when we say “revolution”, we mean a sudden, abrupt change in the infrastructure, a total collapse and then total reconstruction. But when in these changes we say that Iqbal was a reformer, we are not referring to slow and gradual change in society. Our intention is not gradual change or external reform, but we use this word in its general sense which also includes the meaning of “revolution”.

When we say Iqbal was a reformer or that the great thinkers after Sayyid Jamal are known for being the greatest reformers of the century in the world, it is not in the sense that they supported gradual and external change in society. No! They were supporters of a deep-seated revolution, a revolution in thought, in views, in feelings; an ideological and cultural revolution. Iqbal, Sayyid Jamal, Kawakibi, Muhammad Abduh, Ibn Ibrahim and members of the Maqrib lJlama Association are great men who shook the East in the last one hundred years. Their reforms or, still better, “reforming revolutions”, stand upon this principle, for they believe that individual reform is no longer an answer. It is an altogether different matter if reform affects society. A person can no longer think and live in a way which he has chosen for himself, nor accept any influence from his age or his society, and still develop himself into a pure and real human being in a corrupt age and in a degenerate society, for if this were to be possible, then “social responsibility and commitment” would make no sense.


Special thanks to Ali Abbas
Revision by Dr. Bartlett M.D.

http://www.shariati.com

7 Responses to “Muhammad Iqbal, By Ali Shariati”

  1. Glenn said

    Parsin:

    I really like this man. It always seems to be the peaceful warriors that have a real positive, significant impact on this world.

    Like with virtually every religion and non-religious spiritual path, the basics that propelled them initially seem to get buried further with each generation.

    I believe we need a spiritual renaissance across the world. Yes, let’s get back to basics. I can’t see any other way to save our society.

    BTW: I love the way “jihad” is defined here. I knew Mohammad could not have meant it to mean fighting bloody wars were millions die. Again, the Koran — like other Holy Books — is pure but badly misinterpreted.

  2. Parsin said

    Glenn,
    Great people in all societies are like signs of the road. Shariati and Iqbal were both intellectuals in very static society. Their aim was to spread the knowledge and awareness among their people.

    Also, please note that we must see and evaluate each person within the context he lived. In developing countries, specifically in the past, colonization and later neo-colonization were very important in the type of message an intellectual chooses.

    When Gandhi face British colonization, he starts opposing them and trying to free his people and India from the rein of Britain.
    The same is true with Iqbal and Shariati.

    Actually, in Islam we have what is called “the great Jihad” and it is constructing your soul and fighting with low desires (satanic desires). This is even more important than Jihad. And Jihad has always been a defending tool. Of course, when you are in fight with your enemy you must defend yourself. In Islam being aggressive is as bad as accepting oppression. Therefore, Jihad is only a mean to defend. And most important, you are not allowed to use any illegitimate means when fighting the enemy. Prophet Mohammad prevented people from putting fire on enemies houses and farms. He asked the POWs to teach Muslims how to read and write and become free. He prevented them from any sort of torture… Killing innocent people is a big sin. Therefor, it is obvious that terroristic actions that results in killing innocent is condemned by Islam.

  3. Glenn said

    Parsin:

    That is beautiful. Thank you so much for the clarification.

  4. altaf said

    See also the book by Ayatullah Khamenei and Dr. Ali Shariati on Iqbal: Manfistation of the Islamic Spirit — translated into English, read a brief review of the book here.

  5. Ali Baloch said

    I like his poetry Budhay Baloch ki bete ko naseehat means:(Old baloch’s advice to his son) he was the best poet. If you read his poetries and understand them you’ll know how emotional a reader can get.

  6. najeeb said

    On the intellectual after Allama Iqbal , Dr Ali Shariati presents the true face of Islam and the Soul of Islam , in correspondence with the present week situation of the muslim Ummah

  7. Hi there! I could have sworn I’ve been to this website before but after checking through some of the post I realized it’s new to me.
    Nonetheless, I’m definitely glad I found it and I’ll be bookmarking and checking back frequently!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: