Persia

The Land Of First Human Rights Charter

  • "I have no religion, but if I were to choose one, it would be that of Shariati's." Jean-Paul Sartre ---------------------------------- My Lord, grant me success in struggling during failure, in having patience in disappointment, in going alone, in Jihad without weapons, in working without pay, in making sacrifice in silence, in having religious belief in the world, in having ideology without popular traditions, in having faith (Iman) without pretensions, non-conformity without immaturity, beauty without physical appearance, loneliness in the crowd, and loving without the beloved knowing about it. ----------------------------------
  • HAJJ: Reflection on Its Rituals, by Ali Shariati
  • photos: Farshad Palideh & Ehsan Mohammadi
  • May 2008
    M T W T F S S
    « Apr   Jun »
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  

Are Men More Noble/Superior to Women in the Eyes of God?

Posted by Parsin on May 14, 2008

Rights of Women in Islam

By A. Bazargan

Hypothesis:

Verse 34 of Chapter Al-Nesa, according to the following description, is clearly discriminatory with respect to inherent mental superiority of men over women, with men being more worthy of dominance over women and their leading role in the family, and that it requires women to submit to and take orders from their husbands!

الرِّجَالُ قَوَّامُونَ عَلَى النِّسَاءِ بِمَا فَضَّلَ اللَّهُ بَعْضَهُمْ عَلَى بَعْضٍ وَبِمَا أَنْفَقُوا مِنْ أَمْوَالِهِمْ فَالصَّالِحَاتُ قَانِتَاتٌ حَافِظَاتٌ لِلْغَيْبِ بِمَا حَفِظَ اللَّهُ وَاللَّاتِي تَخَافُونَ نُشُوزَهُنَّ فَعِظُوهُنَّ وَاهْجُرُوهُنَّ فِي الْمَضَاجِعِ وَاضْرِبُوهُنَّ فَإِنْ أَطَعْنَكُمْ فَلَا تَبْغُوا عَلَيْهِنَّ سَبِيلًا إِنَّ اللَّهَ كَانَ عَلِيًّا كَبِيرًا

Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because God has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband’s) absence what God would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means (of annoyance): For God is Most High, great (above you all). (1)

Firstly, in the above Verse there is not the slightest mention of mental or inherent superiority of men over women, rather, the only reference is to men being “ghavvam” (قَوَّام) (protector and maintainer,) as a matter of fact and not to a divine decree. Ghavvam means advocate, defender, guardian, protector, attendant, one who is there for the benefit of and at the service of women, not one who is against them. As can also be seen in the world of animals the male always plays the role of the defender and protector of the female in the face of danger. The difference between humans and animals is that in the case of humans the domain of protection and guardianship is much more extensive than that of animals.

The verb ghavvam (قَوَّام) in the above Verse, which is an indication of the subsistence, and real and natural circumstances, is due to two clear reasons:

  1. Some of the gender inequalities of the male sex (to make a generalization) are important in being a defender or guardian, e.g., muscular superiority, far-sighted planning, and being less prone to emotional feelings.

  2. Being responsible for providing for family expenditures and managing joint family assets.

Clearly in any society the responsibilities of management and guardianship are placed foremost on the shoulders of the person who is more capable and has the talent for this responsibility (not for all roles and responsibilities,) and one who has made the monetary investment for such responsibility. With respect to family, the heavy responsibility of providing for family expenses is assigned to the man of family due to superior physical strength and experience in family provisions. Since any family service and responsibility should be reciprocated in turn, the woman’s cooperation in accepting the man as being the custodian of such responsibilities is required.

Unfortunately, many women and men(!) operate under the premise that this guardianship, i.e., supervision, means superiority and that it is a privilege which God has bestowed upon men and that is why the male sex is the preferred sex. In fact, the Qur’an in tens of Verses recognizes the superiority and excellence to be attributes of self-control and does not recognize inherent or sexual superiority.

If in keeping watch and being ghavvam (2) (قَوَّام) for the family men naturally have superiority over women, in many cases women too have obvious advantages over men which are compatible with their natural responsibilities in life.

The other point is that the subject Verse (4:34) is indicative of the way of life of the human societies at the time of the Qur’anic revelations. Clearly, as the societal roles of men and women change, i.e., women in the West nowadays partake in the army, police force, and other hard labors, the basis of the laws governing the role of women in the society will also change and the reasons once valid for such roles will become obsolete. In such cases one needs to seek the answer to the question as to whether this overhaul in the reassignment of family responsibilities based on physical and natural abilities ultimately has resulted in favor of women, or has added more responsibilities on their already weak shoulders and has weakened the foundations of the family as the main pillar of society?

Source


1) Qur’an 4:34

2) Providing support

4 Responses to “Are Men More Noble/Superior to Women in the Eyes of God?”

  1. […] Chris wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt Rights of Women in Islam By A. Bazargan Hypothesis: […]

  2. ANDREEA said

    nu inteleg nimik ca e in engleza:(

    ————-
    Sorry, it seems this is not english!! 😦

  3. Shahrzad said

    I like Mr Bazargan’s Ideas. Are you Melli-Mazhabi?

    ——————-
    No Shahrzad, I am not in any site! I am an independent!!

  4. lizi said

    conscious of the actual machism that exists in México, i´ll have to disagree with the beatin part.

    here is too common to listen in the news of women beaten by their husbands…others killed

    anyways, thanx for clarifyin it =)

    ———————–

    Lizi,
    Thanks,
    Peace and Love to México 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: